ran code format

__tests__/actionUtils.test.ts

@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ test("isCacheFeatureAvailable for ac enabled", () => {
 test("isCacheFeatureAvailable for ac disabled on GHES", () => {
     jest.spyOn(cache, "isFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(() => false);
 
-    const message = "Cache action is only supported on GHES version >= 3.5. If you are on version >=3.5 Please check with GHES admin if Actions cache service is enabled or not.";
+    const message =
+        "Cache action is only supported on GHES version >= 3.5. If you are on version >=3.5 Please check with GHES admin if Actions cache service is enabled or not.";
     const infoMock = jest.spyOn(core, "info");
 
     try {
@@ -252,15 +253,15 @@ test("isCacheFeatureAvailable for ac disabled on GHES", () => {
         expect(actionUtils.isCacheFeatureAvailable()).toBe(false);
         expect(infoMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(`[warning]${message}`);
     } finally {
-        delete  process.env["GITHUB_SERVER_URL"];
+        delete process.env["GITHUB_SERVER_URL"];
     }
-
 });
 
 test("isCacheFeatureAvailable for ac disabled on dotcom", () => {
     jest.spyOn(cache, "isFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(() => false);
 
-    const message = "An internal error has occurred in cache backend. Please check https://www.githubstatus.com/ for any ongoing issue in actions.";
+    const message =
+        "An internal error has occurred in cache backend. Please check https://www.githubstatus.com/ for any ongoing issue in actions.";
     const infoMock = jest.spyOn(core, "info");
 
     try {
@@ -268,7 +269,6 @@ test("isCacheFeatureAvailable for ac disabled on dotcom", () => {
         expect(actionUtils.isCacheFeatureAvailable()).toBe(false);
         expect(infoMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(`[warning]${message}`);
     } finally {
-        delete  process.env["GITHUB_SERVER_URL"];
+        delete process.env["GITHUB_SERVER_URL"];
     }
-
 });

__tests__/restore.test.ts

@@ -34,7 +34,9 @@ beforeEach(() => {
     process.env[RefKey] = "refs/heads/feature-branch";
 
     jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isGhes").mockImplementation(() => false);
-    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(() => true);
+    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(
+        () => true
+    );
 });
 
 afterEach(() => {
@@ -58,7 +60,9 @@ test("restore with invalid event outputs warning", async () => {
 
 test("restore without AC available should no-op", async () => {
     jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isGhes").mockImplementation(() => false);
-    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(() => false);
+    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(
+        () => false
+    );
 
     const restoreCacheMock = jest.spyOn(cache, "restoreCache");
     const setCacheHitOutputMock = jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "setCacheHitOutput");
@@ -72,7 +76,9 @@ test("restore without AC available should no-op", async () => {
 
 test("restore on GHES without AC available should no-op", async () => {
     jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isGhes").mockImplementation(() => true);
-    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(() => false);
+    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(
+        () => false
+    );
 
     const restoreCacheMock = jest.spyOn(cache, "restoreCache");
     const setCacheHitOutputMock = jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "setCacheHitOutput");

__tests__/save.test.ts

@@ -54,7 +54,9 @@ beforeEach(() => {
     process.env[RefKey] = "refs/heads/feature-branch";
 
     jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isGhes").mockImplementation(() => false);
-    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(() => true);
+    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(
+        () => true
+    );
 });
 
 afterEach(() => {
@@ -103,7 +105,9 @@ test("save with no primary key in state outputs warning", async () => {
 });
 
 test("save without AC available should no=op", async () => {
-    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(() => false);
+    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(
+        () => false
+    );
 
     const saveCacheMock = jest.spyOn(cache, "saveCache");
 
@@ -114,7 +118,9 @@ test("save without AC available should no=op", async () => {
 
 test("save on ghes without AC available should no=op", async () => {
     jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isGhes").mockImplementation(() => true);
-    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(() => false);
+    jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "isCacheFeatureAvailable").mockImplementation(
+        () => false
+    );
 
     const saveCacheMock = jest.spyOn(cache, "saveCache");
 
@@ -158,7 +164,7 @@ test("save on GHES with AC available", async () => {
         uploadChunkSize: 4000000
     });
 
-    expect(failedMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);   
+    expect(failedMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
 });
 
 test("save with exact match returns early", async () => {